derpixie's JournalWednesday, April 9, 20085:42PM - The Great AttractorYou casually dismissed a lovely person from your life and neglected one of the best friends you've ever had. It's ironic. You've been acting like the victim. And ultimately you are the only real victim. Friday, September 28, 200711:59AM - TiredI'm really, really tired. I've been this way for a week or two. It's quite unsettling and the vitamin supplements will be coming out soonly. Wednesday, July 25, 20078:54AM - Hallow'd?Page 313 Friday, April 13, 20073:38PM - sunshine on no fixed abodeLooking for places to stay sucks. Wednesday, March 7, 200710:02AM - MarblesIs it really March 7th! Shocked! Current mood: Current music: Joy Division. Wednesday, January 10, 20071:06PM - honesty
Current mood: Tuesday, January 9, 200712:56PM - Alchemist
Current mood: Monday, January 8, 20073:30PM"Ahhh here... " Friday, January 5, 20079:15AM
Pixie - Faerie - yah. And of course, mermaid comes as no suprise. I'm a little suprised dragon came so far down the list. I think this may have to do with my uncertainty over my own temper. I have a bad temper but it takes A LOT to get it started. I am more the grumbling fire within that rolls out an issue of flame in good time. Rarely does a matter need an instant exposion of wrath. It has happened though. Anyway, I yoinked this quiz from SomeLimerickGuy who is a lovely and evil man. :) Current mood: Thursday, January 4, 20077:42PM - Sleepy PixieJanuary is kind of hard isn't it? I don't know if it is my imagination but I seem to be more tired. Current mood: Tuesday, December 19, 20061:43PM - On finding myself constantly looking for an update.....Poll #891731 The Suffolk Strangler The media representation of this story:
View Answers Is objective and fair Is not objective and has placed the legal process in jeopardy. Is objective but police have given too much information ot the public As ever, my interesest in something in the news has awakened that habit I picked up whilst doing some work for a newspaper. As time goes on and different news events occur, I realise how far journalism has strayed from that ideal that was laid down by my seniors in the paper. My views on media are further shaped by my Masters. I was able to see both sides of a story. This has given me a dual opinion of media and newspapers. To what degree is a reporter obliged to inform the public and to what degree should a responsible journalist censor the news. The fact, for me at least, is that this story is so large that there is no point trying to find angles or news. I am curious about this as a story because I want to be able to sleep at night at some point, safe in the knowledge, that the powers of law and order can look after the public. I want to know that if horrible things happen in this world, that we are equipped to sort them. The news, in this specific case, should only be what the police say. I will listen to everything I am told, hoping to hear something that will affirm or persuade me that something can be done or is done. Interviewing a local community, a fellow sex worker, a local official, an expert in the psychology of a serial killer, a milkman, a bus driver, a school teacher, an ex wife, and hearing their opinion does not tell me that the police are going to sort it out. I feel that there is plenty of news out there that deserves speculation and opinion. This is not one of those stories. This isn't, in fact, a story at all. This is a warning, a cautionary statement, a rule of life, a disaster, an awful and horrific occurence. This is a reminder that horrible things happen to people. I was working in a paper on that dreadful day when two planes hit the towers in New York. I had an informal chat with the deputy editor during the week after the tragedy. As we left the office to go get some lunch, she turned to our receptionist and said: "This is great." Going around to people and asking them if they had known anyone in the WTC on the day was going to fill our paper for the week and perhaps for the month. She did say openly "it isn't great of course, its horrible, but you know, its great for ME." This turned me off so much. Now, this attitude is, in a way, very important to a reporter. You need the impetus or the drive to go out and find something and often when you find something, this is worth knowing. There are countless instances of investigative journalism that have proved important. The other side of it is that when a paper and that paper's market is constructed such that anything that carries emotion, pathos, intrique or personal and human interest of any kind, a big story sells papers. The new angle - the emotional angle sell papers. The facts are not selling the paper. But the facts are more important. The human interest has it's place, afterward. Current mood: Monday, December 18, 20063:11PM - Escher
Wednesday, December 6, 20065:46PMI am tired and I have ten minutes to write this. Current mood: Current music: Listening to the radio... Tuesday, December 5, 20065:11PMI don't look at him liked I used to do. In fact, in an Alice-in-Wonderland gone nuts way, I look at him in a divergent way. Current mood: Friday, December 1, 2006Thursday, November 30, 20064:04PM - Did a Quiz
Current mood: 11:50AM - Its actually all about MEHad the old sit down with my boss yesterday... Current mood: Monday, November 20, 20062:55PM - Naive QuestionsDer Pixie was a Feminist of some order in the sense that she was a student-body representative of feminism. The immediate reaction to her campaign (before she was ever appointed) was the voice of the an LGB female officer. A direct message was presented to me along the lines of “your poster must go.” The poster concerned an acrobat bending over backwards. The idea was a play on the expression that to help someone out – you’d bend over backwards. The LGB officer was offended by this. But I felt she was wrong to be offended – she was the one who saw this as meaning anything other than it did. I resented the “order” to remove the poster – the person with the feeling did not approach me directly. I didn’t produce any more copies of the same poster but I didn’t remove any copies. I presented my manifesto and a new poster. As Carrie would say, this incident got me to thinking about feminism a little differently. I wanted to know exactly what I was talking about. I ended up sitting in my university library reading texts on feminist thought. My gut feelings – my initial reactions to what I read went along two lines. Firstly, that sex and gender were not comparable to one another. That sex was unquestionable in most cases but gender was an identity. I was beginning to see the point that women like Germaine Greer made with regard to the way girls were brought up with a gender. Much later on in life, I read Middlesex and saw the way its character Cassie was treated as a Guinea pig in a project to see if gender was inherent or developed. Cassie was born first as a girl and then as a man. As a child she was a girl and as an adult he was a man because of hermaphrodism. Feminism had made arguments regarding the expectations society has on girls and on boys. This was around the time I had an issue with girls having baby dolls. At the time, I felt I may have had this issue because of certain incidents in my own childhood. I had put my baby-doll away one day after my mum had miscarried. But maybe putting them away just created the situation where I questioned them at all. I find baby dolls frightening. I also resent that little girls are being taught to make them go to the toilet and feed them. They do it because they want to be grown up like their mommy. Anyway, that was my first sort of feminist thinking. And it made me angry. I didn’t like being angry. When I read a definition of feminism today I learned nothing new except the names of the women responsible for the publishing of the theories I had read in those texts. The second initial feeling I had about feminism was that it was the preserve of women and was not a single body of thought but the feelings of each woman. I find this latter feeling more difficult to explain. The Female Eunuch has been criticized for being naïve and scattered in its presentation. The feelings of Greer and her reactions to her own life are presented as opposed to solid workable social theories. But reading about this today merely affirms my feeling that feminism is non-entity today. Its roots are different. When reading my texts in my University I saw that women like Gloria Allred were extreme in their feeling that there was no room for men at all what with there being test tube babies and all. And I realized that this may be the view held by some lesbian feminists who would have preferred it if I had not been elected to represent them. Society, as far as I can see, may not be better off without men. I agreed with Christina Hoff Sommers that these feminists were anti-male. I was all for equality. This is where things got interesting for me. A friend of mine held a similar role in another university. I came to know her much later on and long after my crusade against the anti-males. She felt that there should not be a role in student politics devoted to Women’s rights – it should be equality. Then, you look at difference feminism (for example, Carol Gilligan). Women and Men are not the same and things should not be the same for both. These differences are important but do not mean that one is better than the other. As far as I can see, the modern world has been constructed in male terms. The hours that a person works, the manner in which workers are promoted, the pay scales and policies on childcare are all constructed in terms of a world that is dominated by the male representing the human. And women are subjugated in this way. How much any woman feels this and to what extent a women would like to see this changed is down to the individual woman. For example, it is not my place to tell a woman that she should not wear a veil or yashmek. For me, the requirement of a veil in public is chauvinistic but it is not my place to tell the Muslim woman it is. The reason it is not my place to tell her is because it is not my place to tell a woman who is of similar ethnical background to me to not get married. As far as I can see marriage is a form of male dominance in society. Marriage is traditionally the purchasing of a wife and it is assumed that once married a woman should be a “wife.” Civil partnerships are something we should all be allowed to have but we should not be obliged to have them. Two people singing a contract of commitment smacks of something I need to consider further. Why does there have to be a document, like a birth certificate or death certificate? Why does marriage have to be a legal matter? The answer to this question is not along the lines of “so that they receive the same tax incentives as a married couple.” Why are there tax incentives towards marriage at all? These are no doubt naïve thoughts but its still worth starting with those kind of questions.
Current mood: Navigate: (Previous 20 entries) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




























